Sunday, October 20, 2013

Injury in Soccer is Predictable

A study considering the FIFA World Cups (TM) 2010, 2006 and 2002 has revealed some telling information concerning injury. Smart coaches will also be able to garner injury prevention tips.

First to note is that the study considered men's soccer but there is no reason to believe that it would not be true for women and youth players. Secondly, although injuries on this case refer to the physical, much of what is discussed is from a psychological and emotional perspective. There is no doubt that matches are won between the ears first, then on the pitch. This means coaches have a greater responsibility towards the psyche of their athletes that a few motivational words at half time. Confidence, faith, calm, focus- these are all matters of the mind and if mastered will be evident in how they play.

Here are some of the statements from the study which will be published soon in the British Journal of Sports Medicine later this month.

"Male football players are at a greater risk of injury five minutes after a card has been given or after a goal has been scored."

For those who have been in the game for a while, we have heard the saying that a team is most vulnerable just after scoring a goal. We have heard much less about the injury risk increasing after a card has been given. The common thread- emotional upheaval.



                                                                                   



"One theory is that players lose their concentration following disruptive breaks in play, which then increases the risk of injury," says Jaakko Ryynänen, one of the researchers. Sadly, diving is rampant in our sport. As are other attempts to get the opposition booked. It was a positive move by new Manchester United boss David Moyes to publicly critique Ashley Young for simulation, trying to win United a penalty, even after he had been yellow carded. But sometimes, the free kicks and penalties are given. The injustice of it is unsettling both for players and managers. It is not unheard of for managers to be fined after matches for continuing to question refereeing decisions. On the field of play, however, players lose their concentration. An innocuous challenge has been deemed sinister and that player has to tread carefully the remainder of the game. For your holding midfielders who are generally involved in the meaty tackles that disturb attacks, they have to rethink their approach. Often this makes them less effective. Of course, there is the simple reaction of increased aggression to try and right the wrong by 'committing the foul I've been booked for.' Sometimes there is no aggressive reaction, but simply late or mistimed tackles simply because that natural rhythm has been disrupted by thoughts of what has just happened.



                                                                         


There many ways to lose a game. A second yellow. Failure to refocus quickly and conceding another goal. Loss of cohesion following injury to a player. The psychological blow when that injured player is a van Persie or a Messi. The bottom line, if you lose you head, you lose the game. Within the next few minutes actually. "Injury frequency increases within a five minute period after a yellow or red card is issued, and following injuries and goals." Remember that this is a pattern observed over the last three World Cup tournaments. While this window represents the most emotionally volatile period of play, thus being ripe for injuries, it is simultaneously the time when teams are most vulnerable to conceding. This last conclusion is my own but it is not too difficult to see the connection. While it may not be true in every case, pressing home the advantage presented by the momentary unraveling of the emotional and psychological fabric of the opposition could be very lucrative in terms of the score line.


Surprise Surprise


One of two surprising findings of the study is that- "The frequency of player injuries also increases when their own team is in the lead. These are the findings of researchers at the Sahlgrenska Academy. This is not all that difficult to conceive though. Being in behind forces a team to play more aggressively in search of an equalizer increasing the risk for players on the leading team.

Turning their attention to the losing team, the researchers went on to suggest that the pressure of being behind does not increase injury risk evenly among players.

"One possible cause is that the results of any one match are very important in international tournaments. This may accentuate the role of the strikers, leading to increased pressure on them," says Jaakko Ryynänen.

In essence, both winning and losing increase injury risk as a result of increased aggression.



                                                                                                            



The second and most surprising finding published in the article is that injury frequency INCREASES when there is a longer break between matches.

"It sounds contradictory that the risk of injury increases with longer recovery times, but our theory is that this may be due to players losing their focus on match games after a break of several days. Perhaps teams also play at a higher level of intensity after they have rested for a number of days and have more energy."


These serve to to show one thing- that injury is variable in its causes. After all wouldn't we expected that better rested players would be MORE focused? having had time to redirect their energies? It certainly rules out the contributions that fatigue might make, but as the researchers theorize, it means more energy, higher intensity and therefore greater risk of injury.


I believe coaches should be in the business of risk management as much as in producing results. After all, how can you win if your players are all injured? Being able to read the signs that are predictive of injury and managing them well may very well be the deciding factoring winning championships that nobody really talks about.


The article "Foul play is associated with injury incidence: An epidemiological study of three FIFA World Cups (2002-2010)" was be published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine on 15 October.

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Expert Practicing Techniques

You only have to sit down for a few minutes in front of the TV before you see something or other offering you a shortcut to success. As a personal trainer, I can't even begin to talk about how often I see a commercial on some nutritional product or workout equipment that promises the results you want in record time. And we eat that stuff up! I bet you, or someone you know has a treadmill in their basement that gathering dust. But we all know the truth. Whether you want to consider the cliches circulating in the fitness and business worlds, or look at your own life, it is painfully obvious- becoming exceptional at anything requires time and effort. Excellence demands consistently approaching the task at hand with discipline.

Vacillating between these two positions we are aware of (shortcuts vs. staying the course), we invariably fall into the world of anything is better than nothing. So we get strapped, get onto the field and kick ball after ball, run lap after lap, perform drill after drill. At the end of it, we are no better than we were before, but at least we can tweet, "Just finished my workout today." All we need to do is convince ourselves that we spent some time practicing-we have the sweat to prove it. Whether anything is really better than nothing at all is a debate for another post. A more pressing one is, what do those players who spend the same amount of time practicing do in their practice sessions that makes them that much better than us?



For 3 years I played soccer in a league in which the teams were rotated every season. I was privileged to be considered one of those players who were "core" and therefore not available for other teams to select me, just to avoid all the better players ending up on the same team. Despite this status, I was not always first pick on that team. I played where I was asked to play after after the selectors, who also played, gave themselves and their friends their preferred positions, even if there was somebody better. Playing alongside guys that had been friends for years, there was no chance of endearing myself to these guys in order to make them put me in the first 11 on the same basis. I had to put in the practice. So I started running earlier than anyone else. I spent more time in the gym while the other were quad biking and hunting. I even watched film, took notes, and went out to practice. I still wasn't picked on merit until the last season. Even then, there were guys on the team that despite being picked as friends, I felt they genuinely were better than I was. What was it that made them so good while practicing less? Talent? Talent Is Overrated!

Best vs. worst

Researchers from the City University of New York studied basketball players. Would they find a difference between the practice habits of the best free throw shooters (70% or higher) and the worst free throw shooters (55% or lower)?

Of Course!

Here are two for you to think about next time you are practicing or designing a practice session for your athletes.

Difference #1: Specificity

The best free throw shooters had specified what they wanted to accomplish or focus on before the made a practice free throw attempt. It wasn't enough to simply shoot a hundred times, or even get in as many as I can. They focused on where they were trying to get the ball- of the glass and in, or swish. Keep the elbows tucked.

The worst free throw shooters were characterized by more general goals – like “Make the shot” or “Use good form.” What is good form?

Side Note: As Morpheus said to Neo, "There's a difference between walking the path and knowing the path."


Studies like these inspire statements like, "Maybe the other guys didn't know that they had to keep their elbows in." In other words, perhaps the difference between them was knowing what good posture for free throw shooting was actually like. The researchers controlled for this by asking the players. They concluded that there was no significant difference between the two groups in their knowledge about what to do when shooting. Bottom line, its not what you know but what you do.
Difference #2: Taking Responsibility
The best free throwers were rated at 70% and better. For the 30% that they missed the mark, their self talk differed from those in the other group. Their attributions were just as specific as their goals. Thoughts like, "I'm not good enough," were more at home with the lower ranked shooters. Instead, the better shooters thought about the shot analytically. Whatever technical element contributed to the missed shot was addressed in the next shot. Thus, they learnt from every trial, each error becoming the specific goal for the next attempt.

Good players also take responsibility for their performances. Its never about the wind or how good the opponent was. The fact is, those environmental factors are exactly the same that their opponents are facing. They simply were more adaptable, adjusting as needed to these external influences- in other words, they considered what they could not change, focused on what they COULD change (their approach) and learnt as they played.

Practice then does not end during 'practice,' neither is learning limited to when we are running plays and drills before a game. Every shot, every pass, every run is an opportunity for learning. The better players recognize the cues offered and make use their knowledge to think, plan, and direct their practice time more productively.

Next time you are out on the field, act (and think!) like an expert, and soon, you will become one!

Related Articles:

http://thegamebeautiful.blogspot.ca/2012/06/feedback-in-practice.html